{"id":273000,"date":"2026-07-22T03:06:07","date_gmt":"2026-07-22T08:06:07","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/?p=273000"},"modified":"2026-07-22T03:06:07","modified_gmt":"2026-07-22T08:06:07","slug":"past-modals-deduction-b2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/blog\/past-modals-deduction-b2\/","title":{"rendered":"Mastering Past Modals of Deduction (B2 English Grammar)"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"lc-answer\"><strong>Past modals of deduction help us make educated guesses or conclusions about events that happened in the past.<\/strong> We use them when we are not 100% certain, but we have some evidence or information that helps us form an opinion. These modals express different levels of certainty, from being almost sure something happened to being almost sure it didn&#8217;t. The general structure is <span data-no-translation>modal verb + have + past participle<\/span>. For example, if you see wet streets, you might say, <span data-no-translation>\u201cIt must have rained last night.\u201d<\/span> This shows you are very confident about your conclusion. Mastering these forms is key for B2 English learners to express nuanced ideas about past situations.<\/div>\n<h2>What Are Past Modals of Deduction?<\/h2>\n<p>Past modals of deduction are special verb forms that allow us to talk about how likely something was in the past. We use them to express our certainty or uncertainty about past events.<\/p>\n<p>You use these structures when you don&#8217;t know exactly what happened, but you can make a logical guess based on the information you have now.<\/p>\n<div class=\"lc-cta lc-cta-placement\" style=\"border-radius:14px;padding:30px;margin:30px 0;text-align:center;color:#fff;background:linear-gradient(135deg,#2B87DA,#29C4A9);\"><h3 style=\"color:#fff;font-size:22px;font-weight:800;margin:0 0 8px;\">&#9997;&#65039; Not sure which level you are?<\/h3><p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;opacity:.95;\">Take our free placement test and get personalized feedback from certified Cambridge examiners.<\/p><a href=\"\/ru\/%d0%b0%d0%bd%d0%b3%d0%bb%d0%b8%d0%b9%d1%81%d0%ba%d0%b8%d0%b9\/%d0%b0%d0%ba%d0%b0%d0%b4%d0%b5%d0%bc%d0%b8%d1%8f\/%d0%b1%d0%b5%d1%81%d0%bf%d0%bb%d0%b0%d1%82%d0%bd%d1%8b%d0%b9-%d1%82%d0%b5%d1%81%d1%82\/\" style=\"display:inline-block;margin-top:8px;padding:13px 30px;border-radius:8px;font-weight:700;text-decoration:none;background:#0A2540;color:#fff;\">\u041f\u0440\u043e\u0439\u0434\u0438\u0442\u0435 \u043d\u0430\u0448 \u0411\u0415\u0421\u041f\u041b\u0410\u0422\u041d\u042b\u0419 \u0442\u0435\u0441\u0442 \u043d\u0430 \u043e\u043f\u0440\u0435\u0434\u0435\u043b\u0435\u043d\u0438\u0435 \u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u0430<\/a><\/div>\n<h2>How Do We Form Past Modals of Deduction?<\/h2>\n<p>The basic structure for all past modals of deduction is simple:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><span data-no-translation>Modal Verb<\/span> + <span data-no-translation>have<\/span> + <span data-no-translation>Past Participle<\/span> (V3)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>The modal verb changes depending on how certain you are. The <span data-no-translation>have<\/span> and the <span data-no-translation>past participle<\/span> always stay the same.<\/p>\n<h2>When to Use <span data-no-translation>Must Have<\/span> + Past Participle<\/h2>\n<p>\u041c\u044b \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u0435\u043c <span data-no-translation>must have + past participle<\/span> when we are almost 100% sure that something happened in the past. We have strong evidence for our conclusion.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Example: <span data-no-translation>\u201cThe lights are off and the door is locked. They must have left.\u201d<\/span> (You are very sure they left.)<\/li>\n<li>Example: <span data-no-translation>\u201cShe looks exhausted. She must have worked all night.\u201d<\/span> (You are very sure she worked all night.)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>When to Use <span data-no-translation>May Have<\/span>, <span data-no-translation>Might Have<\/span>, <span data-no-translation>Could Have<\/span> + Past Participle<\/h2>\n<p>\u041c\u044b \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u0435\u043c <span data-no-translation>may have + past participle<\/span>, <span data-no-translation>might have + past participle<\/span>, \u0438\u043b\u0438 <span data-no-translation>could have + past participle<\/span> when we think something was possible in the past, but we are not very certain (around 50% sure).<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>These three modals are often interchangeable, meaning you can use any of them to express possibility.<\/li>\n<li>Example: <span data-no-translation>\u201cI can\u2019t find my phone. I may have left it at home.\u201d<\/span> (It&#8217;s possible you left it at home.)<\/li>\n<li>Example: <span data-no-translation>\u201cHe didn\u2019t answer his phone. He might have been sleeping.\u201d<\/span> (It&#8217;s possible he was sleeping.)<\/li>\n<li>Example: <span data-no-translation>\u201cThey didn\u2019t come to the party. They could have forgotten about it.\u201d<\/span> (It&#8217;s possible they forgot.)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>When to Use <span data-no-translation>Can&#8217;t Have<\/span> + Past Participle<\/h2>\n<p>\u041c\u044b \u0438\u0441\u043f\u043e\u043b\u044c\u0437\u0443\u0435\u043c <span data-no-translation>can&#8217;t have + past participle<\/span> when we are almost 100% sure that something did NOT happen in the past. We have strong evidence that makes it impossible.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Example: <span data-no-translation>\u201cShe was with me all day. She can&#8217;t have stolen your wallet.\u201d<\/span> (It&#8217;s impossible she stole it.)<\/li>\n<li>Example: <span data-no-translation>\u201cHe knows the way perfectly. He can&#8217;t have gotten lost.\u201d<\/span> (It&#8217;s impossible he got lost.)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Negative Forms for Possibility: <span data-no-translation>May Not Have<\/span> \u0438 <span data-no-translation>Might Not Have<\/span><\/h2>\n<p>To express a possible negative event in the past, we use <span data-no-translation>may not have + past participle<\/span> \u0438\u043b\u0438 <span data-no-translation>might not have + past participle<\/span>.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>This is different from <span data-no-translation>can&#8217;t have<\/span>, which expresses strong certainty that something did not happen.<\/li>\n<li>Example: <span data-no-translation>\u201cShe didn&#8217;t reply to my email. She may not have seen it.\u201d<\/span> (It&#8217;s possible she didn&#8217;t see it.)<\/li>\n<li>Example: <span data-no-translation>\u201cThey aren&#8217;t here yet. They might not have received the invitation.\u201d<\/span> (It&#8217;s possible they didn&#8217;t receive it.)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<table>\n<caption>Summary of Past Modals of Deduction<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th>Modal Form<\/th>\n<th>Level of Certainty<\/th>\n<th>Example<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span data-no-translation>must have + V3<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span data-no-translation>Almost 100% sure (positive)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span data-no-translation>She must have forgotten.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span data-no-translation>may have + V3<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span data-no-translation>Possible (around 50% sure)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span data-no-translation>He may have gone home.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span data-no-translation>might have + V3<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span data-no-translation>Possible (around 50% sure)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span data-no-translation>They might have missed the bus.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span data-no-translation>could have + V3<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span data-no-translation>Possible (around 50% sure)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span data-no-translation>I could have left it there.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span data-no-translation>can&#8217;t have + V3<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span data-no-translation>Almost 100% sure (negative)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span data-no-translation>You can&#8217;t have seen him.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span data-no-translation>may not have + V3<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span data-no-translation>Possible (negative)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span data-no-translation>She may not have understood.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span data-no-translation>might not have + V3<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span data-no-translation>Possible (negative)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span data-no-translation>They might not have known.<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h2>\u041f\u0440\u0438\u043c\u0435\u0440\u044b<\/h2>\n<ul>\n<li><span data-no-translation>The car is gone. John must have taken it.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span data-no-translation>I saw her leave an hour ago. She can&#8217;t have finished her work already.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span data-no-translation>He looks upset. He might have heard the bad news.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span data-no-translation>They could have missed their train, that&#8217;s why they&#8217;re late.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span data-no-translation>She didn&#8217;t answer her phone. She may not have heard it ring.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span data-no-translation>The window is broken. Someone must have thrown a rock.<\/span><\/li>\n<li><span data-no-translation>It was a secret. He couldn&#8217;t have known about it.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>\u041f\u0440\u0430\u043a\u0442\u0438\u043a\u0430<\/h2>\n<div class=\"h5p-iframe-wrapper\"><iframe id=\"h5p-iframe-516\" class=\"h5p-iframe\" data-content-id=\"516\" style=\"height:1px\" src=\"about:blank\" frameborder=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" title=\"A05 L5 GRAMMAR Past modals of deduction\"><\/iframe><\/div>\n<div class=\"lc-cta lc-cta-exam\" style=\"border-radius:14px;padding:30px;margin:30px 0;text-align:center;color:#fff;background:#0A2540;\"><h3 style=\"color:#F2B705;font-size:22px;font-weight:800;margin:0 0 8px;\">Ready to earn your certificate?<\/h3><p style=\"margin:0 0 16px;opacity:.92;\">Langcom prepares students for Cambridge, IELTS, TOEFL, DELE, SIELE and Michigan exams.<\/p><a href=\"\/ru\/\" style=\"display:inline-block;margin-top:8px;padding:13px 30px;border-radius:8px;font-weight:700;text-decoration:none;background:#F2B705;color:#0A2540;\">Get started with Langcom<\/a><\/div>\n<h2>\u0420\u0430\u0441\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u0442\u0440\u0430\u043d\u0435\u043d\u043d\u044b\u0435 \u043e\u0448\u0438\u0431\u043a\u0438 \u0443 \u043d\u043e\u0441\u0438\u0442\u0435\u043b\u0435\u0439 \u0438\u0441\u043f\u0430\u043d\u0441\u043a\u043e\u0433\u043e \u044f\u0437\u044b\u043a\u0430<\/h2>\n<p>Spanish speakers often make a few common mistakes when using past modals of deduction:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><strong>Using the wrong verb form:<\/strong> A common error is to use a simple past tense after the modal, like <span data-no-translation>\u201cHe must have went\u201d<\/span> \u0432\u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043e <span data-no-translation>\u201cHe must have gone.\u201d<\/span> Remember, it&#8217;s always <span data-no-translation>modal + have + past participle<\/span>.<\/li>\n<li><strong>Confusing <span data-no-translation>can&#8217;t have<\/span> with <span data-no-translation>couldn&#8217;t have<\/span> for strong deduction:<\/strong> While <span data-no-translation>couldn&#8217;t have<\/span> can sometimes express impossibility, <span data-no-translation>can&#8217;t have<\/span> is much stronger and more common for expressing a firm conclusion that something did not happen. For example, <span data-no-translation>\u201cShe can&#8217;t have been at the party; I saw her at home.\u201d<\/span> is stronger than <span data-no-translation>\u201cShe couldn&#8217;t have been at the party.\u201d<\/span><\/li>\n<li><strong>Direct translation from Spanish:<\/strong> Sometimes, learners translate directly from Spanish structures like <span data-no-translation>\u201cdeber de haber\u201d<\/span> (must have) but might confuse it with <span data-no-translation>\u201ctener que haber\u201d<\/span> (have to have), which implies obligation, not deduction. Always focus on the level of certainty in English.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>\u0427\u0430\u0441\u0442\u043e \u0437\u0430\u0434\u0430\u0432\u0430\u0435\u043c\u044b\u0435 \u0432\u043e\u043f\u0440\u043e\u0441\u044b<\/h2>\n<h3>What is the main difference between <span data-no-translation>must have<\/span> \u0438 <span data-no-translation>may have<\/span>?<\/h3>\n<p>The main difference is the level of certainty. We use <span data-no-translation>must have<\/span> when we are almost 100% sure about a past event based on strong evidence. We use <span data-no-translation>may have<\/span> (\u0438\u043b\u0438 <span data-no-translation>might have<\/span>, <span data-no-translation>could have<\/span>) when we are only 50% sure, expressing a possibility.<\/p>\n<h3>Can I use <span data-no-translation>couldn&#8217;t have<\/span> \u0432\u043c\u0435\u0441\u0442\u043e <span data-no-translation>can&#8217;t have<\/span>?<\/h3>\n<p>Yes, you can use <span data-no-translation>couldn&#8217;t have<\/span> to express impossibility in the past, similar to <span data-no-translation>can&#8217;t have<\/span>. However, <span data-no-translation>can&#8217;t have<\/span> often conveys a stronger, more definite conclusion that something did not happen. For example, <span data-no-translation>\u201cHe can&#8217;t have seen me\u201d<\/span> is a very firm deduction, while <span data-no-translation>\u201cHe couldn&#8217;t have seen me\u201d<\/span> might suggest it was impossible due to circumstances, but perhaps slightly less absolute.<\/p>\n<h3>Are <span data-no-translation>may have<\/span> \u0438 <span data-no-translation>might have<\/span> always interchangeable?<\/h3>\n<p>For expressing possibility in the past, <span data-no-translation>may have<\/span> \u0438 <span data-no-translation>might have<\/span> are largely interchangeable. There is a very subtle difference where <span data-no-translation>might have<\/span> can sometimes suggest a slightly lower probability than <span data-no-translation>may have<\/span>, but in most everyday conversations, you can use either.<\/p>\n<h3>How do past modals of deduction relate to B2 English exams?<\/h3>\n<p>Past modals of deduction are important for B2 exams, especially in tasks that require expressing opinions, making inferences, or speculating about past events. For example, in writing tasks or speaking parts, you might need to analyze a situation and make logical deductions about what <span data-no-translation>must have happened<\/span> \u0438\u043b\u0438 <span data-no-translation>could have happened<\/span>.<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Past modals of deduction help us make educated guesses or conclusions about events that happened in the past. We use them when we are not 100% certain, but we have some evidence or information that helps us form an opinion. These modals express different levels of certainty, from being almost sure something happened to being [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":192,"featured_media":273676,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"bwfblock_default_font":"","langcom_teaches":"Past modals of deduction","langcom_cefr":"B2","langcom_type":"grammar","langcom_faq":"[{\"q\": \"What is the main difference between <span data-no-translation>must have<\/span> and <span data-no-translation>may have<\/span>?\", \"a\": \"The main difference is the level of certainty. We use <span data-no-translation>must have<\/span> when we are almost 100% sure about a past event based on strong evidence. We use <span data-no-translation>may have<\/span> (or <span data-no-translation>might have<\/span>, <span data-no-translation>could have<\/span>) when we are only 50% sure, expressing a possibility.\"}, {\"q\": \"Can I use <span data-no-translation>couldn't have<\/span> instead of <span data-no-translation>can't have<\/span>?\", \"a\": \"Yes, you can use <span data-no-translation>couldn't have<\/span> to express impossibility in the past, similar to <span data-no-translation>can't have<\/span>. However, <span data-no-translation>can't have<\/span> often conveys a stronger, more definite conclusion that something did not happen. For example, <span data-no-translation>\u201cHe can't have seen me\u201d<\/span> is a very firm deduction, while <span data-no-translation>\u201cHe couldn't have seen me\u201d<\/span> might suggest it was impossible due to circumstances, but perhaps slightly less absolute.\"}, {\"q\": \"Are <span data-no-translation>may have<\/span> and <span data-no-translation>might have<\/span> always interchangeable?\", \"a\": \"For expressing possibility in the past, <span data-no-translation>may have<\/span> and <span data-no-translation>might have<\/span> are largely interchangeable. There is a very subtle difference where <span data-no-translation>might have<\/span> can sometimes suggest a slightly lower probability than <span data-no-translation>may have<\/span>, but in most everyday conversations, you can use either.\"}, {\"q\": \"How do past modals of deduction relate to B2 English exams?\", \"a\": \"Past modals of deduction are important for B2 exams, especially in tasks that require expressing opinions, making inferences, or speculating about past events. For example, in writing tasks or speaking parts, you might need to analyze a situation and make logical deductions about what <span data-no-translation>must have happened<\/span> or <span data-no-translation>could have happened<\/span>.\"}]","rank_math_title":"Past Modals of Deduction B2 | English Grammar | Langcom","rank_math_description":"Learn to make educated guesses about past events using past modals of deduction (must have, may have, might have, could have, can't have). Improve your B2 English grammar with Langcom.","rank_math_focus_keyword":"past modals of deduction","rank_math_canonical_url":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[588],"tags":[651,827],"formats":[],"class_list":["post-273000","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-b2-upper-intermediate-english","tag-grammar","tag-past-modals-of-deduction"],"dsm_author":{"name":"\u0420\u0430\u0443\u043b\u044c","avatar_url":"https:\/\/cdn.langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/12\/05230819\/1de86ea706740d324aaef3dd8bf0843b.png","archive_link":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/author\/raulmaguinahamann\/","biodata":""},"dsm_categories":[{"term_name":"B2 Upper Intermediate English","term_id":588,"term_link":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/blog\/category\/learn-english\/english-for-teens-and-adults\/b2-upper-intermediate-english\/"}],"dsm_attachment_categories":[],"dsm_featured_image":{"thumbnail":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-150x150.webp","medium":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-300x158.webp","medium_large":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-768x403.webp","large":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-1024x538.webp","1536x1536":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom.webp","2048x2048":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom.webp","trp-custom-language-flag":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-18x9.webp","et-pb-post-main-image":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-400x250.webp","et-pb-post-main-image-fullwidth":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-1080x630.webp","et-pb-portfolio-image":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-400x284.webp","et-pb-portfolio-module-image":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-510x382.webp","et-pb-portfolio-image-single":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-1080x567.webp","et-pb-gallery-module-image-portrait":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-400x516.webp","et-pb-post-main-image-fullwidth-large":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom.webp","et-pb-image--responsive--desktop":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom.webp","et-pb-image--responsive--tablet":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-980x515.webp","et-pb-image--responsive--phone":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-480x252.webp","_nx_notification_thumb_100_100":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom.webp","_nx_notification_thumb_200_200":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom.webp","_nx_notification_thumb_300_300":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom.webp","_nx_notification_thumb_400_400":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom.webp","_nx_notification_thumb_500_500":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom.webp","woocommerce_thumbnail":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-300x300.webp","woocommerce_single":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-600x315.webp","woocommerce_gallery_thumbnail":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom-100x100.webp","full":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/07\/past-modals-of-deduction-b2-grammar-english-langcom.webp"},"dsm_comment_count":0,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273000","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/192"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=273000"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273000\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":273677,"href":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/273000\/revisions\/273677"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/273676"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=273000"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=273000"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=273000"},{"taxonomy":"post_format","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/langcom.org\/ru\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/formats?post=273000"}],"curies":[{"name":"WP","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}